I just want to point out some things about the benchmark as it relates to the new Mac portables.
- The 2.4Ghz MB more than held its own against the Macbook Pro. Of the nine tests, it won four of them. Adobe PS Suite, MPEG encoding, iTunes, and zip archive. With it's dedicated Nvidia 9600 GPU and larger cache, the new MBP won the Speedmark 5, unzip archive, and, obviously, the Quake 4 frame rate with 59 FPS.
- The 2.4Ghz MB achieve a wonderful 39 FPS in the Quake 4 test, coming at 67% of the MBP number.
- The 2.4Ghz MB with 39 FPS in the Quake 4 test is more than 5X the early 2008 Macbook. The new 2.0Ghz MB also bested the early 2008 Macbook more than 5X.
- The new white Macbook bested the 2Ghz Macbook in 4 of the 9 tests, likely because of the higher clock rate.
Personally, I'm still leaning towards the 2.4Ghz Macbook over the 2.0Ghz version but for folks who are debating between the 2.0Ghz and the new white MB, it's more difficult. On one hand, the new white Macbooks have a faster chip and firewire while the 2.0Ghz Macbook has an LED screen and new body form.
So, there you go. This provides us a good reference and starting point for comparison. Macworld promises more results soon.
Also, Microsoft is looking to deploy Silverlight on the iPhone and G1 to head off Adobe. Getting it to work on Android is more likely to happen than on the iPhone. Adobe has been talking about it for months, most recently in September, but nothing has come of it. Wouldn't hold my breath there.
Note: This weekend, I'll be looking into those leftover Macbooks and Pro ones. There is a lot of value in there. Right now, I'm torn between an early 2008 Macbook Pro ($1444, $1645) Amazon versus the 2.4Ghz Macbook.